Origins Of The Cold War - 1465 Words

18.1- Origins of the Cold War †¢ Allies Clash o After World War II finally came to an end, the United States and Soviet Union had conflicting ideas of how to restore the world back to normal. ï‚ § Stalin wanted complete and ultimate control over the countries that were within the borders of the Soviet Union, spreading communist regimes. ï‚ § Meanwhile, the United States wished for all these states that were under Nazi rule to have self-determination. o This essentially formed a rivalry between the ideals of capitalism versus the beliefs of communism. o Yet, Stalin and Truman were very skeptical of each other and for good reasons too. ï‚ § The United States knew Stalin was not trustworthy as he turned for American aid only after Hitler invaded†¦show more content†¦o Due to his inexperience and being successor to someone as great as FDR, the people had much doubt in him and waited to see if Truman could prove himself as a worthy president. o Tensions between Truman and Stalin would begin to unveil at the Potsdam Conference, months after the Yalta Conference in which FDR was at. ï‚ § Stalin took advantage of the situation and made it clear he would not keep his promise of allowing Eastern Europe to be free, as he banned democratic parties and elections. o In addition, both the Soviet Union and the United States were enduring boom of industry, requiring more natural resources from other parts of the world. o This caused Stalin to tighten his rule over Eastern Europe, as he felt he deserved it as reparations due to the damage of World War II. ï‚ § The Cold War, a conflict in which Capitalism and Communism indirectly fought each other, had begun and would continue for almost a century. †¢ Fight Against Communism o Stalin began to build several communist regimes all throughout Eastern Europe in countries such as: Albania, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Romania, and Poland. ï‚ § This region became known as satellite nations in which Stalin announced that capitalism and communism cannot exist in peace together. o The United States responded with the policy of containment, which meant to take any measure to prevent communism from further spreading. ï‚ § Europe was

Autism And Asperger Syndrome Similarities And Differences

Autism and Asperger Syndrome are two similar disorders and are too often confused. The average person knows little about either, (often thinking the two are the same), and this ignorance leads people to make hasty rationalizations. The difference between the two can often be great, which is why they are separate disorders. While people fail to see the difference, distinguishing between the two can be as easy as recognizing the severity of one’s problem. While they share similar characteristics and signs there is a difference between these two disorders. So what is autism? Autism is a developmental disorder that can cause severe impairments in attention, cognition, communication, and social functioning. In the most extreme forms, persons†¦show more content†¦While they may share similar symptoms Autism is more severe in every way than Asperger’s. Asperger syndrome is an autism spectrum disorder considered to be on the â€Å"high functioning† end of the spectrum. Affected children and adults have difficulty with social interactions and exhibit a restricted range of interests and/or repetitive behaviors. Motor development may be delayed, leading to clumsiness or uncoordinated motor movements. Compared with those affected by other forms of ASD, however, those with Asperger syndrome do not have significant delays or difficulties in language or cognitive development. Unlike autism, Asperger’s isn’t diagnosed early on. It often goes unnoticed until children or adults begin to have problems in school or work respectively. They may have difficulty interacting with others and have quirks that others may see as strange. When these symptoms begin to be noticed by family or friends they may be taken in for an evaluation where they are diagnosed with Asperger’s. Some may go their whole lives without being diagnosed even when they do have it because they have such moderate symptoms. When their disorder is mild it could go unnoticed until they are an adult and even then it may not be certain they have this disorder. While Autism and Asperger’s share characteristics they are actually very different. Although Asperger s syndrome is similar in some ways to autism there are some important differences. Children with Asperger s

Is Super Size Me Convincing free essay sample

The doctors were certain that if he did not end the experiment immediately, he would have caused irreparable damage to his body. Using the rhetorical triangle, we can illustrate how the documentary utilizes the three points of logos, ethos, and pathos in order to establish a well founded, credible, and effective argument. Without the use of the rhetorical triangle, trying to create a well founded, credible account of anything would be difficult. One could argue that if an argument lacks any part of the rhetorical triangle, the argument is incomplete, and has no credibility or effectiveness. The rhetorical triangle provides the structure; the frame of a well thought out and well presented meaningful argument. And by doing so – using the rhetorical triangle, on can create a nearly foolproof reasoning and support for something they believe or support. This is what Spurlock has done here. The message; the appeal to ethos – the argument, the reason, data, evidence, and structure. We will write a custom essay sample on Is Super Size Me Convincing? or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The documentary uses simple, straightforward scientific methods to gather, collect, and analyze the data obtained from the study. Spurlock does this in order to get the message to people that eating nothing but fast food all of the time is terribly detrimental to your body. Your health suffers, and can even affect you mentally. Throughout the movie, he provides a simple structure of the task at hand, to eat nothing but McDonald’s all day, every day, for every meal. He does this to show that in no way is eating fast food good for you and that it should absolutely be limited if not totally eliminated from your diet. Fast foods have caused – or at least helped to cause many American’s problems with obesity and iseases such as diabetes. There have been many studies to support these claims and none are unfounded assumptions. The next unit of the rhetorical triangle that the documentary has covered is that of pathos – the audience and the appeals to their emotions, beliefs, values, knowledge and experience. Every American and many of the other peoples of the world have heard of McDonaldâ⠂¬â„¢s. They all know of food, and most have had experience with it as well. They know that it tastes good, and is fast and easy. They believe that it is perfectly harmless as well, most of them, anyhow. What they don’t know is that it is absolutely terrible for you and causes much more harm than good. What the movie tries to do is show how the effects of eating so much fast food can harm you. The results can be absolutely horrible, and if left uncorrected could lead to permanent damage. The movie tries to use the shock and scare factor of your emotions to get their message across that this stuff is no good. Any intelligent, rational person will take a step back and think twice about what they eat and especially whether or not to eat fast food, even a little. The effect for some people may be nothing, but others, like me will initially completely avoid fast food because of the shock that the movie gave us. Later on, however, after the shock has passed it is no big deal to go back for a burger – which can be dangerous. The biggest appeal to fast food it just that – it is fast. It is fast, easy, convenient and tasty. Quite appealing. The use of pathos on children is especially prevalent in McDonalds. They target children everywhere, on television, in schools, on signs, and on billboards. Children today cannot avoid them. They use these advertisements almost subliminally, so that the children will crave and seek out their food. Once they get there, they are overwhelmed with flashy, fun advertising gimmicks. They have happy meals with toys to entice them with, and a playground too. Why wouldn’t a child want to go to a place like that? Food, toys, and a playground all in one, it is wonderful. I remember I used to always enjoy going there as a kid. I cannot stand McDonalds now, however, for many it has and will become a life-long bond of company and consumer. This is exactly what McDonalds wants and is what they thrive on, f course – they are a business. The last appeal to be covered is that of ethos – credibility, authority, appearance and eloquence. Here, as in other aspects there are two sides to the ethos in this documentary. On one side is Spurlock and his doctors and professionals, and on the other side, McDonalds. First off, McDonalds wants you to think that their food is noth ing but tasty and filling – which it can be. They do not want you to know the harmful and unhealthy aspects of eating there. After all, they want you to come back and spend more money! What Spurlock wants to do with his documentary is get the message out that what we are doing to ourselves by eating this food is hurting us. He wants to expose that what the fast food business is doing is wrong. He does a good job of doing this, as he is very clear about what he is doing, and how he does it. He uses credible people such as doctors, scientists, and specialists to support his claims and make sure what he tells us is accurate. He does a great job of creating a convincing argument – one that is difficult to pick apart and find fault within. He has done a great job of providing clear, concise, convincing data. The movie Super Size Me is a great documentary and does a wonderful job of – well, documenting the research that Spurlock has done. He put himself through thirty days of hell of eating nothing but McDonald’s food in order to show what would happen if that is all you ate – nothing but McDonald’s food for an entire month. The result was shocking and horrifying at the same time. Spurlock gained over twenty pounds of body fat – while probably losing quite a lot of muscle mass and gained nearly twenty percent body fat. After thirty days that is amazing. His health deteriorated to the point that he nearly caused permanent damage to some of his vital organs such as his liver. The results were simply shocking, and they were foolproof as well, everything was done in a way that no one can argue with them and say that well, this was not caused by eating only McDonald’s. It was all directly caused by the food. This a very well structured and convincing study and they have done a great job through the documentary of portraying the information to the public.